Volume 4, Issue 5 And S5 (Monograph 2012 2013)                   2013, 4(5 And S5): 35-41 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Feyzi P, Kamali H, Yazdani A, Hashemimoghadam H. Comparison of solvent extraction and hydrodistillation of essential oil from Biebersteinia multifida DC. Conjunction with gas chromatography – mass spectroscopy . North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences 2013; 4 (5) :35-41
URL: http://journal.nkums.ac.ir/article-1-408-en.html
Abstract:   (11118 Views)

Abstract Background & Objectives:The modern essence extraction methods are following special patterns in order to increase the quality, prevent the contamination, and decrease the sample preparation costs. In order to get the best essence possible, subjects like the herbal components properties, suitable solvent and precision should be put into serious consideration. In this current study we have compared the Biebersteinia multifida DC essential oils obtained with two different solvents and methods, hydro distillation and normal hexane extraction. Material and Methods:After collecting the plant sample, and conducting the drying procedure, the essential oils were obtained using two various methods, solvent extraction and the hydro distillation (Clevenger). Later the essential oil components were analyzed using GC, MASS SPECTROSCOPY devices. Furthermore the yield of extraction was also studied for both of the mentioned methods. Results:In hydro distillation protocol and solvent extraction method 30 and 13 compounds were recognized respectively. On the other hand the optimum time for the Clevenger method was calculated to be 360 minutes however it was 3 days for solvent extraction method. The most profound advantages about the hydro distillation method can be its short duration, high extraction yield and using the non toxic-environmental friendly solvent. Conclusion: Selecting the most proper method should be based on the desired compound. The extraction yield for the Clevenger method was 1.33 times more than the solvent extraction method.

Full-Text [PDF 419 kb]   (16184 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal Research | Subject: Basic Sciences
Received: 2015/03/28 | Accepted: 2015/03/28 | Published: 2015/03/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb