27. Grove SK, Burns N, Gray J. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. 7 ed: Saunders, Elsevier Inc; 2013.
28. Polit DF, Tatano Beck C. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Ninth ed: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
29. Stolberg HO, Norman G, Trop I. Randomized controlled trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(6):1539-44. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831539PMID: 15547188
30. Borglin G, D AR. Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(1):123-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.06.016PMID: 19643408
31. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):601-5. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.ADPMID: 18316340
32. Mbuagbaw L, Thabane M, Vanniyasingam T, Borg Debono V, Kosa S, Zhang S, et al. Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: a systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;38(2):245-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.012PMID: 24861557
33. Lindsay B. Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability? J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(1):84-94. PMID: 14675304 [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02864.x
34. Guo JW, Sward KA, Beck SL, Staggers N. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research. Nurs Res. 2014;63(1):26-35. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000007PMID: 24335911
35. Mills EJ, Ayers D, Chou R, Thorlund K. Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias? Contemp Clin Trials. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.019PMID: 26232560
36. McCrae N, Blackstock M, Purssell E. Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(7):1269-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.002PMID: 25726430
37. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001PMID: 22036893
38. Mohammady M, Janani L. [Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice]. Hayat. 2016;22(2):102-14.
39. Group TC. The CONSORT Statement: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials [cited 2016 October]. 2010:[Available from: http://www.consort-statement.org/.
40. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11:32. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32PMID: 20334632
41. Levy PS, Lemeshow S. Sampling of populations: methods and applications: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
42. Moradi M, Asadi-Samani M, Mobasheri M. [Evaluating the quality of materials and methods for writings of final proposal in clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences based on consort checklist]. J Clin Nurs Midwifery. 2013;2(4):1-7.
43. Cohen JW. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2 ed. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
44. Peters JP, Hooft L, Grolman W, Stegeman I. Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122328. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122328PMID: 25793517
45. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Kang W, Kim E. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. Trials. 2012;13:77. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-77PMID: 22676267
46. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, Reporting Bias G. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66844. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844PMID: 23861749
47. Kao LS, Tyson JE, Blakely ML, Lally KP. Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):361-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.10.003PMID: 18222393
48. Stommel M, Wills CE. Clinical research: Concepts and principles for advanced practice nurses. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
49. Boutron I, Tubach F, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P. Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(6):543-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.010PMID: 15246122
50. Ayatollahi M-T, Jafari P, Ghaem H. [Evaluation of the Quality of Clinical Trials Published in the Medical Sciences Journal of Iran during 1380-1382]. Babol Univ Med Sci J. 1384;4(7):64-70.
51. Amanollahi A, hokraneh F, Mohammadhassanzadeh H, Ebrahimi-Kalan M, Gh. B. [Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials Indexed in PubMed Using CONSORT Statement]. Health Inf Manage. 2012;9(3):415.
52. Heydari A, Rad M. [The Methodological Accuracy in Interventional Medical Education Articles Published in Approved Iranian Journals from 2005 to 2013]. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2014;10(4):459-66.