Volume 3, Issue 5 And S5 (monograph2011 2012)                   2012, 3(5 And S5): 7-13 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esmaeili H, Salari M, saki A, Gholizadeh B, Boskabadi M, Lashkardost H. Comparing odds ratio (OR) from fitting independence, marginal and conditional models in analyzing the individual matched case-control studies with simulation data. North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences 2012; 3 (5) :7-13
URL: http://journal.nkums.ac.ir/article-1-245-en.html
Abstract:   (6812 Views)

Abstract Background & Objectives One of the popular studies in medical sciences for finding risk factors and the reason of the disease, are case-control studies that the important index we can calculate is odds ratio. but some confounders which effect on response variable challenge the OR’s validity and present OR more or less than the real value. One way of omitting the effect of confounder is designing matched studies. Logistic regression is one of the general methods for modeling these studies. This article compares 3 logistic regression models: independence, marginal and conditional. Materials & Methods: This study has been conducted on correlated simulated data. Thus the data is simulated from bivariate normal distribution with the correlation coefficients (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8). Then with changing cut-off points at (0.05, 0.25), (0.25, 0.1), (0.25, 0.15), (0.25, 0.25) for their c.d.f, we convert continues distribution to categorical binary distribution which data are related together. Then 3 logistic regression model in independence, marginal and conditional version fit to data and calculate OR. With 10000 times iteration, we compare 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles values and the median OR percentile value at the above cut-off points for all their models. Results: When the correlation is zero, all three models have the same quantity for OR and also changing in point have the same coefficient. But with the increasing correlation between the observations, OR between marginal model and independence model is not different. But its value will vary with the conditional model. For example, the cut-off point (0.25,0.1) and when the correlation is 0.6, median of OR that obtained in marginal model and independence model is 2.8, but in conditional model this quantity is 5 and it is twice of fitted value. Conclusion: When the correlation between observations is high, using of conditional model is more correctly method and with increasing this correlation, our error rate by using independence or marginal model rises. But when correlation between observations is negligible, using of the three models gives similar estimates.

Full-Text [PDF 363 kb]   (2446 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Orginal Research | Subject: Basic Sciences
Received: 2015/01/12 | Accepted: 2015/01/12 | Published: 2015/01/12

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb